Know what needs attention now.
The current coverage pulse, the risks that warrant review, and the next steps for each proposed owner.
Reviewed · 4 Oct 2026
Prioritise the reported Ibese Assembly follow-up and truck-parking commitment. Verify specific safety allegations separately. Reconcile expansion funding, cross-market pricing and issuer identities; keep refinery disputes and promotional complaints distinct from Cement findings.
Coverage pulse
Checking for current coverage…
Assessment reviewed 4 Oct 2026 using fresh selected coverage and three refreshed alerts. Headline statistics and trends cover complete days 22 Sep–3 Oct; 4 Oct is partial and excluded. These are project-wide signals, including Refinery and Group coverage, not Cement-only totals. Event peaks and topic metrics use different scopes and are not added to these daily totals. Owners and actions are proposed; scores are analyst judgements and do not update automatically.
Historical coverage
Historical query: 7 June–7 September 2026; daily figures refreshed through 3 October. First returned activity: 31 July. Earlier zeros do not establish an absence of coverage; collection history needs confirmation. Today is an incomplete day.
Daily totals are imported project statistics. The feed contains 28 relevance-selected historical examples, not all underlying mentions. The examples are a selected sample of the available coverage.
Conversation themes and reputation relevance
22 September–3 October · complete-day window
Automated topic clusters provide context across Cement, Refinery and Group discussions. Counts and potential reach can overlap; they are not summed into risk scores. A negative label does not verify an allegation.
| Theme | Mentions | Potential reach | Negative share within topic | Assessment context |
|---|
Recent conversation trend
Daily monitored mentions · 22 Sep–3 Oct 2026
5 × 5 risk matrix
Click a cell to isolate its risks
Needs leadership attention
Highest exposure and fastest-moving narratives
Publishing channels · current review
22 September–3 October · project-wide monitored mentions
Coverage as it arrives.
Explore the rolling three-month coverage window by date and original source. Automatically checks every five minutes while this page is open; publisher delivery times vary.
Three-month coverage timeline
Checking available history. Unavailable periods do not mean there was no coverage.
Weekly counts of retrieved items after filters. Click a week to explore it. No records means no retrieved records, not a confirmed absence of mentions.
Conversation mix
Topics detected in the current combined feed.
Explore every material risk.
Reviewed 4 October 2026. Explore exposure and who each risk matters to, with evidence, confidence and proposed next actions.
Choose a stakeholder to rank by relevance: Direct, Related, then Watch; ties use exposure. Relevance is an analyst assessment, not evidence of a stakeholder’s expressed position or an ESG rating.
Exposure = severity × likelihood of reputational escalation (1–5 each). Scores, evidence confidence and stakeholder relevance are separate. Previous scores and reasons for changes appear in each risk.
Reputation risks
| Risk | Issue & signal | Score | Channel | Status | Owner | Who this matters to | Reviewed |
|---|
Filtered exposure
How the current selection is distributed by response priority.
Select a risk to inspect its trigger, narrative, evidence, owner, and mitigation actions.
Turn signals into action.
Suggested tasks grouped by readiness. “Analysis completed” reflects dashboard work—not confirmed company action.